One particularly embarrassing fact about the Mormon religion that arose from the Reed Smoot hearings, which were held between 1904 and 1907, was that the Mormon religion didn’t really give up polygamy with the “1890 Manifesto”. The “1890 Manifesto” was a formal decree by the Mormon religion to finally end polygamy in the United States. But, as it really turned out, not only were high-ranking Mormons getting permission from the Mormon religion’s “First Presidency” to enter into polygamous marriages AFTER the issuance of the “1890 Manifesto”, the esteemed members of the religion’s “First Presidency” were even kind enough to preside at these illegal polygamous marriages. Further, Mormon apostle John Henry Smith was quoted at the time as saying, “…the Manifesto was but a trick to beat the devil at his own game”. The implications here are rather obvious, and seem to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the mendacity and malevolence of the Mormon religion and Mormon people who live by this creed of deceit. It also seems that when people of average intelligence begin questioning anything having to do with the Mormon cult, or Mormon culture, strange things begin percolating in the darkened depths, and only begin revealing themselves as they slowly begin to float to the surface and start becoming exposed by the light of the sun. One such mystery could be the truth behind the mysterious death of child TV star Gary Coleman. There are so many questions surrounding his death that need to be answered. For example, why in God’s name would Coleman move to a little Mormon town in Utah anyway? Obviously, Coleman was not aware of the Mormon religion’s history of slavery, racism and utter debauchery.

One person, who posted on TMZ’s website, which has an article entitled, Shannon Price: I Was Gary's Common-Law Wife raises some interesting points. “Kate” wrote her comments in post number 133, which is shown below:

Post 133. “I think what everyone is not getting is that Gary died in Utah. In Utah, where the LDS church is headquartered. In Utah, where most of the population is of the LDS persuasion. Gary met Shannon while shooting a movie for the LDS church. LDS elders would NEVER, E-V-E-R allow a "gentile" to be in an LDS production, let alone would they allow a Member not in good standing to appear in said production if their tithes are not current. A Hollywood star? Even a former, washed-up child star? Sure... that potentially brings more interest to the movie. That means, Shannon Price is a member in good standing of the LDS church. The LDS church fiercely protects it's own... and when the entire tiny town is LDS, investigating one of it's own, and the victim is not LDS... justice (as most of us know it...) goes straight out the window.

Don't ask me how I know these things...” - Posted at 9:28 on Jun 10, 2010 by Kate

See, Kate's Post in "Shannon Price - I was Gary Coleman's Common-Law Wife"

Gary met his acerbic Mormon princess, Shannon Price, on movie set of a movie being filmed in Utah called Church Ball. The storyline from this contemporary Mormon comedic masterpiece includes a basketball theme wherein the “church” [Mormon] basketball team is looking for a “ringer” to become a member of their basketball team. As it turns out, the coach of the team soon learns that a “Black guy” lives in the neighborhood, and automatically jumps to the conclusion that this “Black guy” must be a star basketball player and would make a good “ringer” for the team. The coach ultimately tracks down, and meets, this would-be ringer only to learn that the “Black guy” is only 4’ 8”, and has a strong desire to play basketball. This is indeed comedic genius, but only if you lived in Alabama in the 1960’s, Johannesburg South Africa during apartheid or Utah when the movie was made in 2006. Regardless, not only do the viewers get to laugh at this ridiculous premise, they get to laugh again as 4’ 8” Black basketball player, Gary Coleman, tries to become part of the team and compete with superior "white" teammates. By the way, the manner in which the Mormons always "stack the deck" to win, is not unlike how they typically compete in real life. It is hard not to make a connection between this sort of comedic genius and a Mormon religion who owned slaves north of the Mason-Dixon line prior to the start of the Civil War and fought 3-wars with the United States to try and preserve their right to own slaves north of the Mason-Dixon Line. Of course, there are virtually no Americans alive today who know anything about this dark-side of the Mormon cult. But, there is evidence of this. Incredibly, Joseph Smith and his Mormon cult even had their own racist doctrine about “Blacks and slavery” called the “Doctrine of Cain”, which today’s white supremacist neo-Nazi Mormon fundamentalist "Christian Identity" movement morphed into their own “Two-Seeds Doctrine” to hide any connection to the Mormon religion. And, of course it wasn’t until 1978 that the Mormons were finally forced to allow “Blacks” to have their holy Mormon Mechizedek priesthood.

Incredibly, every major "Christian Identity Group" in America today was founded by Mormons or Mormon fundamentalists. This includes Ben Klassen (World Church of the Creator), Dan Gayman (Church of Israel), Robert Mathews (The Order), James Ellison and Kerry Noble (The Covenant, the Sword and the Arm of the Lord) and Peter Langan (The Aryan Republican Army). And, every one of these organizations assisted in creating the terrorist environment that led to the 1993 WTC bombing, the 1995 OKC bombing and 9/11. Remember also that Joseph Smith actually wrote a prophecy about 9/11 in 1831, and that on September 11, 1957, Mormons dressed up as Indians and massacred 120 innocent men, women and children in what is today known as the Mountain Meadows Massacre. This is the same insane culture that Coleman married into, and re-located to when he purchased his house in Santaquin, Utah and began living in marital bliss with his lovely white Mormon princess. Santaquin, Utah, located only about 20-miles south of Provo, Utah, and probably would not be considered the “heart of American diversity” by any stretch of the imagination. Provo is, of course, most famous for Brigham Young University, which brings to mind one of Brigham Young’s famous quotes:

“..Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so. The nations of the earth have transgressed every law that God has given, they have changed the ordinances and broken every covenant made with the fathers…” – Brigham Young, "The Persecutions of the Saints, etc.," (8 March 1863) Journal of Discourses 10:111

The Mormons were actually kicked out of New York in 1830, and Ohio by 1838 because they owned slaves north of the Mason-Dixon Line after the enactment of the “Missouri Compromise of 1820”, which officially relegated slavery to States south of the Mason-Dixon Line. In fact, this is actually why Joseph Smith and his Mormons began migrating to Missouri in the first place, because Missouri was a slave state. Because of the conmpromise, Missouri was admitted as a “northern state”, but it was also admitted as a “slave state”. And, in another incredible coincidence, Joseph Smith’s “first vision” occurred in 1820 the same year as the “Missouri Compromise of 1820”, So, I would submit that Joseph Smith's real “first vision”, which coincidentally occurred in 1820 the same year as the "Missouri Compromise of 1820", was really a fearful vision by Joseph Smith and his cadre of slave owners in upper New York State that they would would either have to move to a slave State, get rid of their slaves or fight the Government of the United States. Unfortunately, none of the above alternative seemed very appealing to them, so they also created a brand-new religion with an insane Mormon theology that taught that God cursed all of the dark-skinned people of the world with the “mark of Cain” and the seditious notion that the Mormon cult would one day vanquish Christianity and conquer America. They also ultimately decided to move to Missouri, which was a slave state, and fight their 3-wars with the American Government.

This is what actually inspired the genesis of the racist, pro-slavery and anti-Semitic Mormon religion, and brought America the Mormon “Doctrine of Cain”, which teaches that Blacks and Jews were sired by God's brother, the devil. Then between 1820 and 1830, Smith feverishly began plagiarized his new Mormon religion from the King James Bible, Freemasonry, the Deist philosphies of Thomas Paine and other philosophies of the day, wrote his fictional masterpiece, the Book of Mormon, which told the story of white Nephites, who were the lost tribe of Israel, who came to America in wooden submarines (no kidding!). By 1830, Smith's body of fraudulent nonsence was ready and he formally incorporated his Mormon religon as the Church of Christ in Fayetter, NY on April 6, 1830, and also published his Book of Mormon in 1830. Further, Smith was well aware that the Constitution of the United States would now have to protect his whacky cult because of "religious freedom". And, in what can only be described as a blatant mendacity, the Mormon religion today even tries to claim they were persecuted in Missouri because Joseph Smith and the poor Mormons were actually progressive abolitionists who wanted to end slavery almost 20-years before the great Abraham Lincoln ended slavery. This fictitious and embarrassing mendacity of the Mormon religion is even fully documented as “history” in the “Mormon” section of the so-called Encyclopedia of anti-Slavery and Abolition that was authored by Gordon C. Thomasson.

This is only just one of the great lies being foisted on the unsuspecting people of America today by the Mormon media machine, which would also be the nation’s 12^th largest media company, if it was a real tax-paying corporation. In reality, after the Mormons arrived in the Utah territory, not only did it become the only slave territory in the western territories, but Brigham Young and his Mormons owned both Black and American Indian slaves as well. Such were the Mormon “Laws of God” in the sovereign Mormon theocratic nation of Deseret. In fact, a slave by the name of Green Flake was even tithed to the Mormon religion in 1850, after James M. Flake died and his widow didn’t want to deal with the burden of owning a slave. And, Mormon slaves were coerced into participating in the both the Gunnison and Mountain Meadows Massacres. By 1886, the Mormons were becoming so desperate for statehood that they blamed slavery and racism on Brigham Young who died in 1877 and couldn’t defend himself (one of his polygamous wives poisoned him with arsenic after learning he was about to give her lovely daughter to some geriatric polygamous old coot), and concocted the lie that Joseph Smith was a progressive abolitionist. Further, A.O. Smoot, father of Reed Smoot, who was at one time the esteemed Mayor of Salt Lake City actually owned slaves in Utah and was one of Brigham Young's muderous "danites". Reed Smoot, A.O.'s son, when elected as a Utah's Senator, caused a major controversy after it was disclosed he had committed an act of treason against America by pledging the "Mormon Oath of Vengeance Against America". The "Reed Smoot Hearings" also led to further disclosures that the Mormon "First Presidedency" was presiding over polygamous marriage even after the "1890 Manifesto", which supposedly ended polygamy in Utah, and a revelation by Mormon Apostle John Henry Smith who was quoted as saying, "The Manifesto was but a trick to beat the devil at his own game". The implications here are rather obvious, and seem to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the mendacity and malevolence of the Mormon religion.

And, here is actual proof that Joseph Smith and his Mormons owned slaves in Kirtland, Ohio in 1836. In 1836, Joseph Smith and his main contingent of Mormons in Kirtland, Ohio were visited by Federal agents who were there to remind them that slavery was banned north of the Mason-Dixon Line. Smith was so angered by this that he wrote a letter, which he then published in April of 1836 in his very own Mormon Newspaper, the Messenger and Advocate.

“DEAR SIR: —This place (Kirtland) having recently been visited by a gentleman who advocated the principles or doctrines of those who are called ABOLITIONISTS, and his presence having created an interest in that subject, if you deem the following reflections of any service, or think they will have a tendency to correct the opinions of the Southern public,...you are at liberty to give them publicity... I FEAR that the sound might go out, that 'an Abolitionist' had held forth several times to this community,...all, except a very few, attended to their own vocations, and left the gentleman to hold forth his own arguments to nearly naked walls.

I am aware that many, who PROFESS to preach the Gospel, complain against their brethren of the same faith, who reside in the South, and are ready to withdraw the hand of fellowship, because they will not renounce the principle of slavery, and raise their voice against every thing of the kind. This must be a tender point, and one which should call forth the candid reflections of all men, and more especially before they advance in an opposition calculated to lay waste the fair states of the South, and let loose upon the world a community of people, who might, peradventure, OVERRUN OUR COUNTRY, AND VIOLATE THE MOST SACRED PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN SOCIETY, CHASTITY AND VIRTUE.... I do not believe that the people of the North have any more right to say that the South shall not hold slaves, than the South have to say the North shall.

How any community can ever be excited with the CHATTER of such persons, boys and others, who are too indolent to obtain their living by honest industry, and are incapable of pursuing any occupation of a professional nature, is unaccountable to me; and when I see persons in the free states, signing documents against slavery, it is no less, in my mind, than an army of influence, and a DECLARATION OF HOSTILITIES, against the people of the South. What course can sooner divide our union? After having expressed myself so freely upon this subject, I do not doubt, but those who have been forward in raising their voices against the South, will cry out against me as being uncharitable, unfeeling, unkind, and wholly unacquainted with the Gospel of Christ...the first mention we have of slavery is found in the Holy Bible,...And so far from that prediction being averse to the mind of God, it remains as a lasting monument of the DECREE OF JEHOVAH, to the shame and confusion of all who HAVE CRIED OUT against the South, in consequence of their holding the sons of Ham in SERVITUDE.

I can say, the CURSE IS NOT YET TAKEN OFF FROM THE SONS OF CANAAN, neither will be until it is affected by as great a power as caused it to come; and the people who INTERFERE THE LEAST WITH THE PURPOSES OF GOD in this matter, will come under the LEAST CONDEMNATION BEFORE HIM; and those who are determined to pursue a course, which shows an opposition, and a feverish restlessness against the DECREES OF THE LORD, will learn, when perhaps it is too late for their own good, that God can do his own work, without the aid of those who are not dictated by His counsel.

Joseph Smith”

3-years earlier, in 1833, Joseph Smith created another firestorm when he published his Book of Commandments, which contained this passage:

"For it shall come to pass, that which I spake by the mouths of my prophets shall be fulfilled; for I will consecrate the riches of the Gentiles, unto my people which are of the house of Israel."  – Joseph Smith, (BOC 44:32.)

During this same period of time, Mormons had already been migrating en-mass to Independence, MO for about 2-years already. And, they had been settling on, and appropriating, the lands of non-Mormon “gentiles” who settled Missouri prior to their arrival. Consequently, by 1833 the tension between Mormons and non-Mormon “gentiles” was already quite high. Smith’s “commandment”, essentially ratified the "taking" of these “gentile” lands by extra-legal means, and ignited a firestorm. And, all hell broke loose after the Missouri “gentiles” learned about Smith’s Book of Commandments, and his commandment about how the Mormons could simply take whatever they wanted from the "gentile" because they were the "lost tribe of Israel". This also essentially provided the catalyst for the Missouri War, which lasted between 1832 and 1838, at which point Missouri Governor Boggs was forced to issue an executive order for all Mormons to leave the State of Missouri entirely. So, how does all of this relate to Gary Coleman and Shannon Price? Just like the reader said above, Coleman was immersed in an environment that espouses white racial purity, lies and “protects its own”. Coleman was a Black gentile outsider without any real friends in Utah. And, all of the authorities that most Americans take for granted as being there to help in an emergency are really there for their white Mormon brethren only. Mormon theology also teaches that it is OK for Mormons to break the “Christian” laws of Moses (10-commandments) and the Judeo-Christian laws of the United States, which are "of the Jew", "man-made" and are not “Gods-Laws” of the Mormon religion. Consequently, if Shannon and her friends, family and community wanted to have Coleman’s “riches” consecrated unto them, it would probably would be very easy to orchestrated this entire incident.

Unfortunately, Coleman was worth much more dead then alive. This is because of his Screen Actors Guild and American Federation of Television and Radio Artists pension that is probably worth millions. If Shannon were to somehow, shall we say, "acquire" this pension, that would also mean that the Mormon religion also get a cut of Coleman's pension as well. Actually this is not so far-fetched, and there are some revealing precedents for Mormons “making things happen” in a manner that is beneficial to them. One specific example is the September 11, 1857 Mountain Meadows Massacre wherein Mormons dressed up as Indians and massacred 120 innocent men, women and children who were traveling through southern Utah. The Fancher wagon train, which was traveling from Arkansas to California via Utah, was an extraordinarily wealthy wagon train, and carried gold bullion, cash, furniture, livestock and other assets that members of the Fancher party carried with them to make their new life in California more comfortable. But, after every single person was massacred, except for a few toddlers who couldn't comprehend what has happened, all of these assets remained in Utah rather than being returned to the rightful heirs of the deceased.

It is also well documented that certain “church leaders” in the Mormon religion “inherited” some very nice furniture, which made fine additions to their houses, suddenly had bountiful herds of livestock, as did some of the real Indians who helped out and that the Mormon religion benefited from a mysterious cash windfall. Another instance of "creative wealth consecration" by members of the Mormon religion is the infamous “Mormon Will” of 1978, wherein Melvin Dummar, who was Mormon, claimed to have picked up Howard Hughes in the middle of the desert one day. Hughes was allegedly so ecstatic about this that he immediately wrote out a new will that left 1/16 of his billion dollar estate to Dummar and 1/16 of his estate the Mormon religion in Salt Lake? Further, his "will" was kept at headquarters of the Mormon religion in Salt Lake by esteemed Mormon president Gordo B. Hinckley (it was later proved to be a fake).

Coincidentally, the whole “Howard Hughes / Mormon Will” thing occurred at exactly the same time that Mark Hoffman, the infamous master forger and “salamander bomber”, was forging documents and selling them to former Mormon President Gordon B. Hinckley. Just goes to show you that Gordon Hinckley really was no different than Joseph Smith, they were both unscrupulous shysters. I could go on and on and on and on and on. The story of the Mormon cult in America includes an almost infinite supply of stories and accounts just like this one. And, they are all true. But, I guess the only questions that remain to be answered about Coleman now are: